New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Brian on 26 Jul 2006 14:05 "Richard The Dreaded Libertarian" <null(a)example.net> wrote in message news:pan.2006.07.27.00.03.36.583840(a)example.net... > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:33:35 -0700, JeffM wrote: > >>>http://analog-innovations.com/NewRuleBook.png >>> Jim Thompson >> >> Well, the book is very old--just new players in the game. >> Can you suggest an alternative >> where the good guys are still distinguishable from the bad guys? > > Yeah - the good guys are the ones who don't make war. > > Thanks, > Rich Boy, that was the stupidest thing I heard in a long time!
From: Brian on 26 Jul 2006 14:11 <bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote in message news:1153867569.346771.140750(a)m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > Jim Thompson wrote: >> http://analog-innovations.com/NewRuleBook.png > > Osama bin Laden would be perfectly happy if the he provoked the U.S. > into tearining itself to pieces in a frenzied pursuit of largely > imaginary terrorists, and Jim is too ignorant to realise that he is > playing along. > > -- > Bill Sloman, Nijmegen No terrorists? Who flies planes into buildings, straps bombs to themdselves to detonate in public places, strike nearly everyday killing innocent people? Are those Cub Scouts?!?!??!
From: JeffM on 26 Jul 2006 14:31 >formal declarations of war are obsolete, > Stephen Rush > **Ignoring** the Contittution does not make it obsolete. >especially in the United States, >where they activate a bunch of inconvenient old laws >(like the Trading With The Enemy Act) >that the the old men who really run things would rather ignore. > Ah. Now we get to the truth of the matter. Profit above all! These guys have really big lobes (ears--not brains). http://www.google.com/images?q=Ferengi
From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen on 26 Jul 2006 14:08 "Richard The Dreaded Libertarian" <null(a)example.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:pan.2006.07.27.00.03.36.583840(a)example.net... > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:33:35 -0700, JeffM wrote: > >>>http://analog-innovations.com/NewRuleBook.png >>> Jim Thompson >> >> Well, the book is very old--just new players in the game. >> Can you suggest an alternative >> where the good guys are still distinguishable from the bad guys? > > Yeah - the good guys are the ones who don't make war. Ah - Like the *dead* indians?? > > Thanks, > Rich > >
From: krw on 26 Jul 2006 15:20
In article <ea8asi$5uo$1(a)nntp.aioe.org>, brian(a)w3gate.com says... > > "Richard The Dreaded Libertarian" <null(a)example.net> wrote in message > news:pan.2006.07.27.00.03.36.583840(a)example.net... > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:33:35 -0700, JeffM wrote: > > > >>>http://analog-innovations.com/NewRuleBook.png > >>> Jim Thompson > >> > >> Well, the book is very old--just new players in the game. > >> Can you suggest an alternative > >> where the good guys are still distinguishable from the bad guys? > > > > Yeah - the good guys are the ones who don't make war. > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > Boy, that was the stupidest thing I heard in a long time! > Stick around. Rich (the whatever) can do better than that. -- Keith |