From: FromTheRafters on
"Heather" <fergie(a)canada.invalid> wrote in message
news:hpdrvv$f4p$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...

> See......teaching ******* does have its intellectual points. And
> because that fatuous idiot in Devon reads these groups, I will not
> divulge what I taught that involved time and space.

Have you ever taught anything that didn't?


From: David H. Lipman on
From: "ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net>

| FromTheRafters wrote:
>>"ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
>>news:4bb9dfdb.992437(a)EDCBIC...
>>> ~BD~ wrote:

>>> <cut to the chase>

>>>> but in reality is a link to a hostile website.

>>> I still maintain that with a properly configured browser,
>>> there's no such thing as a hostile website.
>>> At least no more hostile than someone's carelessness permits.
>>> I've even gone so far as to exhort folk for an example,
>>> yet no one has arisen to that challenge.

>>Indeed, many exploits were of browser extensions rather than the browser
>>itself. I used to disallow scripting and would never have dreamed of
>>having my browser automatically open acrobat reader.

| Acrobat isn't even on board here,
| all pdf's point to foxit.
| (with the run/save option box always presented)

>>IMO a 'properly
>>configured browser' as you put it, would be more like that - that shuts
>>off a major ingress vector right there.

| The fact that it's not that hard to do has me amused when some folk seem to
| tremble in fear of browsing and are constantly seeking more 'protection', even
| to the point of causing scanner collisions and conflicting actions.

| And something else while I'm here;
| How do so many people get plagued by malware bearing trojans if they're all as
| clean cut above board web surfers as the fantasy suggests? Could it be that
| this group would wither away without all the warez trafficking behavior that
| is so hypocritically chastised?

http://www.us-cert.gov/current/index.html#foxit_reader_3_2_1

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: Dustin Cook on
"Ant" <not(a)home.today> wrote in
news:i_adne5lTqB90SfWnZ2dnUVZ7qUAAAAA(a)brightview.co.uk:

> "Dustin Cook" wrote:
>
>> "Ant" wrote:
>>> I just found out that I'm older than Dustin Cook's dad. With regard
>>> to computers, I've been operating/programming them since 1974.
>>
>> 4 years prior to my even existing. :) Not that it matters much. In 8
>> more years, I'll be older than my Dad.
>
> Is he going to be stuck in time? Hang on a minute, are you saying he
> was only 8 or 9 years old when you were born?

No. He passed away at age 40. I'm almost 33 now. So in 8 years, I will be
older than him; as he's dead and isn't aging anymore...It's just one of
those things you don't expect, then one day.. it happens.

>> I don't think I ever tried to say I'd be doing this longer than you
>> Ant. :)
>
> You never know, you may end up doing that - or does being an old geek
> not appeal?

the geek doesn't bother me as much as it did in school; intelligence has
nice rewards, but at the same time it's a double edged sword. I had a
sinking feeling when I was a kid messing around computers how things
would be when I got older. And for the most part, things worked out as I
expected them too. Very disappointing, but predictable.

If you wound up with a family and the nice house and pickett fence and
all that jazz then you beat the norm. Being a geek usually includes
antisocialism; and for me, it will eventually be my undoing. heh, the
irony of the whole situation is I more than likely will be directly
responsible; perhaps on purpose even.

So to sum it up, if getting older (60s, 70s) or however old you are,
under present conditions does not appeal to me.


--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

From: Dustin Cook on
~BD~ <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
news:YqGdncs-IZP7yyfWnZ2dnUVZ8kednZ2d(a)bt.com:

> Ant wrote:
>> "Dustin Cook" wrote:
>>
>>> "Ant" wrote:
>>>> I just found out that I'm older than Dustin Cook's dad. With regard
>>>> to computers, I've been operating/programming them since 1974.
>>>
>>> 4 years prior to my even existing. :) Not that it matters much. In 8
>>> more years, I'll be older than my Dad.
>>
>> Is he going to be stuck in time? Hang on a minute, are you saying he
>> was only 8 or 9 years old when you were born?
>>
>>> I don't think I ever tried to say I'd be doing this longer than you
>>> Ant. :)
>>
>> You never know, you may end up doing that - or does being an old geek
>> not appeal?
>>
>>
>
> I may be wrong, but I think Dustin's dad died at an early age (40?).
>
> It's always sad to lose a loved one.

Car accident.. yea...




--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

From: Dustin Cook on
~BD~ <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:YqGdnco-
IZNfyyfWnZ2dnUVZ8kdi4p2d(a)bt.com:

> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "FromTheRafters"<erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org>
>>
>> | "~BD~"<BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>> | news:v9adnYvt7piHOiTWnZ2dnUVZ7tudnZ2d(a)bt.com...
>>
>>>> I do not believe he/she is involved in Cybercrime in any way. /Those/
>>>> are the 'bad guys' in which I am interested.
>>
>> | Software piracy isn't cybercrime?
>>
>>
>> Bindo !!
>>
>> IP theft of the Internet is indeed a "cybercrime".
>>
>
> It is exactly what TRT accused Malwarebytes of doing - and they did!

Excuse me? Please explain exactly what you mean by this...




--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior