Spyware Blaster Database Updated 3|12|2010
in [Spyware]
|
From: SeaNymph on 16 Mar 2010 20:08 You don't seem to be accepting any "challenge". Seems to me you want someone else to do your work for you. "~BD~" <BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:yoCdnRPgJNQklD3WnZ2dnUVZ8oGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > Jenn wrote: >> "~BD~"<BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:UaKdnV5Uusz0JAPWnZ2dnUVZ8mGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... >>> Jenn wrote: >> <snip> >> >>>> umm ... being an intermediary between two men who aren't getting along >>>> is >>>> like asking to have my head scalped, and then beat to a bloody pulp and >>>> doing so voluntarily.<g> It's possible to do, but I could come out >>>> of >>>> it >>>> more injured than either one of you. :D LOL That's not to say I >>>> haven't >>>> been an intermediary before and done so successfully.<g> It takes >>>> time >>>> and there are rules to follow as far as communicating in that sort of >>>> setting. >>> >>> >>> I'll be gentle with you! :) >> >> >> uh huh LOL but what if I'm not gentle with the two of you? Huh? huh? :D > > > I'm not looking for preferential treatment. > > >>>> Skype will only do 1-video to 1-video .. it won't do video with 3 >>>> people >>>> at >>>> a time, but it will do a conference voice chat with 3 people at the >>>> same >>>> time, which is kind of cool. >> >>> I understand. If Peter Foldes *agrees* to have a video Skype call with >>> you, and does, it will clear him of any suspicion of being a bad guy. >>> >>> If he will not - well, it will simply confirm my fears, eh? ;) >> >> Well ... I'm guessing he won't be willing. Many men aren't good >> communicators.. they prefer the 'bull in china closet' approach and if >> that >> doesn't work they move on to the >> 'let-me-see-just-how-many-buttons-I-can-push' approach which usually >> involves alot of poking at the other persons hot buttons just to see how >> much of a reaction they can get. > > > I'm confident that PF will not accept such a challenge. > > >>>>> I won't hold my breath! :) >>>>> >>>>> If you *do* manage it, then I'm a Dutch Muslim! >>>>> >>>> >>>> haahahahaa ... I dunno.. Dave .. Seems you two have been going at it >>>> a >>>> long time. I'm not saying either one of you is right or wrong... >>>> probably >>>> both of you have been right and wrong on occasion. It just seems like >>>> you >>>> both are old enough to find a way to get past your differences, but it >>>> takes >>>> both of you to get there.... just saying...... it could happen if >>>> ya'll >>>> want it to. >>> >>> >>> Well - he lies; I tell the truth. Simple as that! >>> >> >> It's either that.. or he just resorts to the latter method of male >> communication that I mentioned above. > > > Mr Foldes has told blatant lies for years. I've found a bit of 'history' > which you may wish to peruse! > > http://forums.whatthetech.com/Do_you_know_much_about_Rootkits_t58382.html&gopid=261724#entry261724 > > I hope it confirms many of the things I've mentioned! > > -- > Dave >
From: SeaNymph on 16 Mar 2010 20:09 No, I don't need to do any such thing. I asked you a direct question which you won't answer. So be it. "~BD~" <BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:SZidnSZbMIVxkz3WnZ2dnUVZ8j2dnZ2d(a)bt.com... > SeaNymph wrote: >> So, what exactly are you saying? > > I'm saying that I tell the truth - and Jenn knows that. > >> Are you saying that you know Jenn knows the truth because God told you >> that? > > No, that is not what I said. > > You must decide for yourself and/or pray for guidance, Linda. > > -- > Dave >
From: SeaNymph on 16 Mar 2010 20:10 You don't know what I believe. Why don't you just stick to what you know...whatever that might be and quit attacking me? "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message news:hnp572$p02$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > ~BD~ wrote: >> SeaNymph wrote: >>> So, what exactly are you saying? >> >> I'm saying that I tell the truth - and Jenn knows that. >> >>> Are you saying that you know Jenn knows the truth because God told >>> you that? >> >> No, that is not what I said. >> >> You must decide for yourself and/or pray for guidance, Linda. > > She can't because she doesn't believe that way. > > -- > Jenn (from Oklahoma) >
From: SeaNymph on 16 Mar 2010 20:12 You are some crazy conspiracy theorist. You yourself were banned and most of us are well aware of why that happened. Yet, you maintain a bogus account so you can continue to read groups in AC. What a joke! "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message news:hnp4h6$knt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Peter Foldes wrote: >> BD >> >> Just to add >> >> Why were you banned from AOL,Annexcafe,Ahuma and why are you posts >> deleted off the MS servers. The latter is just the iceberg of >> organizations' and groups that have banned you. > > I hate to tell you this, but being banned from space on the internet isn't > a big deal. It's air with people trying to control it for the sake of > pushing their own personal agenda's. I bought my own piece of air space > ... ain't it grand that we all can have our own piece of the pie .. free > speech and all. You say potaaaato .. and I say potaahto ... AOL/AC/Ahuma > are all just tiny pieces of air in a huge sky.... that would make anyone > boasting that they haven't been banned from a tiny pc of air look a bit > silly, pretty much. Who cares? There's always more air space a person > can go out an purchase. > >> Can you explain to us why and why are they at fault and in you own >> observation why these things happen. > > Well.. I sure can explain it. There are people out there who fancy > themselves to be in control (control freaks) of the air space and when > people come along who aren't butt kissers, a clash begins to take place > between the people who fancy themselves as being 'in control' of the air > space and those who aren't 'butt kissers'. The clash often results in the > control freaks attempting to banish those who "disobeyed" the rules > written on the wind and often times hope that those who are banished will > take it as a sign that they have been 'bad'. > > The expectation is that such a banned person will reign in their > disobedient self and take their punishment like adults.. BECAUSE ... of > course (said with sarcasm) the control freaks deem that the person > deserves punishment, which is banishment from the group. Now, the problem > with that scenario is that control freaks can't get their "fix" off of the > punishment they tried to impose unless the banish-ee is seen to be humbled > and somehow repents for their "obvious" transgressions against the control > freaks group. IF, they don't take their punishment to heart, then, of > course, the control freaks must make sure they let everyone else know just > how BAD the banish-ee is because many people don't have the ability to > think for themselves and prefer someone else to think for them... ergo ... > they just do what their control freak management tells them to do because > it's easy and comfy that way. Weaks minds actually need the control > freaks to coddle them that way. > > Are you following me so far? > > > -- > Jenn (from Oklahoma) >
From: SeaNymph on 16 Mar 2010 20:13
You're a fine one to tell people to produce, or as you so childishly put it...put up or shut up. You don't, why should anyone else? "Jenn" <nope(a)noway.atnohow.anyday> wrote in message news:hnp3fr$eeu$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Peter Foldes wrote: >> BD,Boater Dave,David Brooks and all the other names you use which is >> too long to post here > > ... normal for the internet > > <snip clap trap> > >> Jenn you buddy buddy apparently suffers from the same. Takes one to >> know one > > <looks at self> I'm not suffering from anything in particular.. although > I live with type 2 diabetes and my feet hurt off and on. > >> BTW. I can back up everything I said on a Hard Copy but to be more >> enjoyable for everyone I will wait with doing it and let you bury >> yourself further and deeper. Jenn will love it. PROMISE > > Go for it ... put up or shut up. :) and btw .. his wifes name isn't > Thrish. > > -- > Jenn (from Oklahoma) > |