From: stephe_k on
mikey4 wrote:
> <stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:h916ml$lne$3(a)news.albasani.net...
>> mikey4 wrote:
>>
>>> People are pissed because "they" have finely woke up to the fact that the
>>> "government" is out of control and has been for a very long time.
>> Well I was pissed watching GWB spending BILLIONS on a war while giving
>> MASSIVE tax breaks to the wealthy. I was pissed watching him do NOTHING
>> other than watching the economy fail. Were you? Some of us didn't just
>> "wake up" because a republican wasn't in the white house. If Obama had
>> been handed a healthy country and done this, I'd be pissed right there
>> with ya, but that isn't what happened.
>>
>> Stephanie
>
> My point here Stephanie is that this entire mess is a result of *both*
> parties screwing the pooch for *years and years and years*. The republicans
> win by a land slide and they *think* they have a mandate, they don't, people
> were sick and tired of what the dems were doing. The dems win by ands land
> slide and well, you finish the sentence.
> They have us right where they want us, squabbling about this party did that
> and the other party did this.
> News flash, BOTH PARTIES are doing US.!!!
>
>


Did I ever say I was a democrat? There are some republicans I am OK with
too. Overall I think NONE of them are representing us. I guess I just
feel Obama has my interests more at heart than GWB ever did.

BTW GWB won by the smallest margin in history yet claimed a "mandate".

Stephanie
From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab51751$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>>><stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> mikey4 wrote:
>
>>>>>> People are pissed because "they" have finely woke up to the fact that
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> "government" is out of control and has been for a very long time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well I was pissed watching GWB spending BILLIONS on a war while giving
>>>>> MASSIVE tax breaks to the wealthy. I was pissed watching him do
>>>>> NOTHING
>>>>> other than watching the economy fail. Were you? Some of us didn't just
>>>>> "wake up" because a republican wasn't in the white house. If Obama had
>>>>> been handed a healthy country and done this, I'd be pissed right there
>>>>> with ya, but that isn't what happened.
>>>>> Stephanie
>>>>
>>>>My point here Stephanie is that this entire mess is a result of *both*
>>>>parties screwing the pooch for *years and years and years*.
>>>
>>> It is a fundamental policy of republicans to cut taxes for the rich
>>> and reduce or eliminate government regulation while allowing
>>> corporations free reign. Those policies cause this current economic
>>> climate.
>>>
>>> Lack of regulation allowed the finanicial collapse. Cutting taxes for
>>> the rich left the middle class further in debt. Free reign for
>>> corporations allowed them to cut worker salaries in order to give
>>> countless millions to execs.
>>>
>>> And when the middle class doesn't have money to spend, and when the
>>> financial industry collapses, and when the rich ship their money out
>>> of the country, then you get an economy that's in the toilet.
>>>
>>> --
>>Here we go with rays typical response. There was no lack of regulation
>>ray,
>>you really need to read up on the SEC and how it came about.
>
> For the stupid: There were insufficient regulations to control the
> sort of financial instruments that led to the collapse.
>
For the putz, next time say so. Try reading about the SEC anyway.


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab5180c$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> Bill Graham <weg9(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>><stephe_k(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:h916ml$lne$3(a)news.albasani.net...
>
>>> Well I was pissed watching GWB spending BILLIONS on a war while giving
>>> MASSIVE tax breaks to the wealthy. I was pissed watching him do NOTHING
>>> other than watching the economy fail. Were you? Some of us didn't just
>>> "wake up" because a republican wasn't in the white house. If Obama had
>>> been handed a healthy country and done this, I'd be pissed right there
>>> with ya, but that isn't what happened.
>>>
>>> Stephanie
>>I still don't understand about these, "massive tax cuts to the wealthy".
>>the
>>last time I checked, the more money you make, the greater percentage you
>>have to pay, .....that's what the tax tables in the form 1040 tell me.....
>
> That's the sort of ignorant thinking that gets rightards into trouble.
>
> There are many ways the wealthy get to pay lower taxes. Her's one:
> Long-term capital gains and dividens aren't taxed as regular income.
> It's a flat 15% even before you find any deductions. So, if you own a
> ton of stock that pays you $250/yr in dividends then you pay no more
> than 15% of that as income tax. If you are given $100,000,000 in
> stock by the company and you sell it a year later, you pay 15%.
>
> --
Mean while dip sh.t, the liberal government you love so much just keeps
right on spending.


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab51946$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote:
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
>>> Neil Harrington <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote:
>>>>"David Ruether" <d_ruether(a)thotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> "Neil Harrington" <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote in message
>
>>>>>> Much the same with the latest ACORN scandal, which stunk so badly
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> even Democrats in Congress finally voted to stop funding ACORN. But
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> never even heard about it from ABC, CBS or NBC, did you?
>>>>> [Nonsense deleted...]
>>>>>
>>>>> What was shown on tape from a *few* ACORN locations (but where
>>>>> were the reportings of the ones that threw out these imposters?)
>>>>
>>>>What makes you think ANY of the ACORN offices did or would do any
>>>>differently from the ones on tape? ACORN is rotten and corrupt to the
>>>>core.
>>>
>>> If that's true then it must also be true of the Republican party given
>>> the number of Republicans who have been shown to be lying,
>>> philandering hypocrites.
>>
>>Just like the lefttards
>
> Never trust a man who gives online retorts with *no* substance.
> mikey in <h8rvun$1hb$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>
> --
Snip away ray there are a few of us who know your true colors.


From: mikey4 on

"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4ab5199f$0$1630$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net...
> Neil Harrington <not(a)home.today> wrote:
>>"Walter Banks" <walter(a)bytecraft.com> wrote in message
>
>>> All the Canadian patients who come to the US for necessary
>>> health care have the costs paid for by the Canadian health
>>> care system. That includes elective procedures.
>>
>>No, I don't think so.
>
> You don't think.
>
>>> The spending in Canada is about half per person of the
>>> US health costs.
>>
>>Because it's rationed.
>
> That's a bald-faced lie.
>
> It's the US that rations health care. People die as a result.
>
> --
Prove it ray.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Prev: Pittsburgh
Next: Incompatible jpeg?