ELF loading
in [ASM]
|
From: Evenbit on 29 Aug 2007 22:43 On Aug 29, 7:29 pm, CodeMonk <jas...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Jim Carlock wrote: > > > > > North Carolina Swimming Pool Builders > >http://www.aquaticcreationsnc.com/ > > > > I'm going with the Diamond Brite Super Blue Plaster - Reminds me of > the Caymans. Nice job. > Ssshhh! Don't encourage him!! We *want* him to be a LAMP guy! :) [the "A" doubles for "ASM" and "Apache", of course] Nathan.
From: CodeMonk on 30 Aug 2007 00:20 Evenbit wrote: > > Ssshhh! Don't encourage him!! We *want* him to be a LAMP guy! :) > OK, but don't forget to turn the LAMP on !!! - Scott
From: Jim Carlock on 30 Aug 2007 00:31 "Evenbit" wrote... : Let us know how it goes. Finally, I've got hard drive activity! I kept doing the Automatic thing previously where I let it automatically partition the drive into 12.6GB and a 300KB swap drive. And that ended up getting nowhere! So I thought I would try configuring things the way I didn't know how to configure things. And I've finally got some hard disk activity! It got up to the 83% mark this time pretty quick. As long as it doesn't putter out here... which it just did... Oh well... wait I still hear those little hard drive heads moving back and forth... come on... get past 83%... keep on going... awhh shucks, there it goes again... it puttered out... I wonder if I can throw a newer older processor into that machine... or if I've got a mother board that the newer older processor (1.3GHz Athlon as opposed to 350KHz K62). What's up with the 83% install spot ??? > : Let's try not to wake Granny with our Morrison tunes > > "Alabama Song"? : Some things are self-destructive. "The Unknown Soldier" "The End" : "Riders on the Storm" and its sequal. He had some ... wow ... it made it past 83% and started over at 1%. They had some pretty grim songs. Didn't he used to talk to a big Indian in his dreams (or was it drugs)? The drugs took over everything and he lost control. That song, "The End", pretty much summarizes what went on inside his head. If you look at it that way, it could even summarize what goes on inside alot of our heads, you know, the twisted turning paths that we might walk along in our lives... Some folks don't get out of that which perhaps is what happened to Mister Morrison, and the drugs ended up as his way out. His father being a big Navy guy, and Jim's dis- like of the VietNam war... There's a lot there and some of his songs seem to identify the turmoil of the Viet Nam war and the conflict(?) between him and his father. It's almost like he resented the fact that his father was in the armed services fighting for the country. Jim Morrison attended Saint Petersburg Junior College. Not that it makes a difference one way or another, but since you've brought up Jim Morrison. I live a couple miles from that college. XUBUNTU installed... :-) -- Jim Carlock North Carolina Swimming Pool Builders http://www.aquaticcreationsnc.com/
From: rhyde on 30 Aug 2007 00:32 On Aug 28, 8:00 am, Betov <be...(a)free.fr> wrote: > "rh...(a)cs.ucr.edu" <rh...(a)cs.ucr.edu> écrivait news:1188311924.038766.63820 > @r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com: > > > Then why not add static linking to your assembler? You may have no > > reason to use it, but it will certainly please some > > Because i am not used to work for implementing stupidities, > even when when people want it, clown. Of course, this statement is in complete opposition to your statement two posts ago. Oh well, no one has ever accused you of making any sense. hLater, Randy Hyde
From: rhyde on 30 Aug 2007 00:36
On Aug 28, 9:08 am, CodeMonk <jas...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Betov wrote: > > >> Then why not add static linking to your assembler? You may have no > >> reason to use it, but it will certainly please some > > > Because i am not used to work for implementing stupidities, > > even when when people want it, clown. > > This deficiency could be addressed by wrapping the requisite LIB in a > DLL and using the LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress API functions. An > annoyance to be sure, but it's the only viable work-around I see. There are many bigger problems than just the annoyance. First of all, there is the version problem (also known as "DLL Hell"). Second, there is the issue of size: loading a DLL gets you *all* the routines, not just the ones you actually call. Of course, there is also the issue that functions in a DLL must be called indirectly. Often, this is done by linking in an extra JMP instruction (admittedly, not necessary, but many tools wind up doing this). Also, DLLs carve up your address space inconveniently. A problem if you have huge memory allocations or you use (large) memory-mapped files. Static linking avoids all of these problems. hLater, Randy Hyde |