ELF loading
in [ASM]
|
From: //o//annabee on 30 Aug 2007 12:35 P� Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:26:43 +0100, skrev //\\o//\\annabee <w(a)w.w.w>: > > This runs fine!! well no... it is silently killed.... ??? > > but the reprogamming of IDT does not work. > > >> >> >> Betov. >> >> < http://rosasm.org > >> >
From: rhyde on 30 Aug 2007 11:44 On Aug 30, 4:52 am, Betov <be...(a)free.fr> wrote: > CodeMonk <jas...(a)yahoo.com> écrivait news:sdxBi.69571$pu2.22712 > @bignews1.bellsouth.net: > > > the ability to statically link with modules or > > libraries that programmers have neither the time, nor possibly the > > capability to reinvent, is a basic premise in the real world > > Innovations don't care of the real world. Yes, that's why all your ideas are so well-received on "Planet Betov." Here on Earth, however, most of your "innovations" are not very useful. Your problem is that you seem to come up with so few ideas that when you actually get one (original or otherwise) you stubbornly stick to it even when it becomes clear that it just doesn't work. "Static linking is not assembly" is a prime example. Writing an assembler for an OS that will never be ready for prime time is another. Too bad you are incapable of admitting you've made a mistake and moving on. Then, OTOH, maybe your recent experiments with Linux demonstrate that, after 10 years, you finally *can* realize you've hitch your horse to the wrong wagon. hLater, Randy Hyde
From: //o//annabee on 30 Aug 2007 12:46 P� Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:55:04 +0100, skrev Betov <betov(a)free.fr>: > //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <w(a)w.w.w> �crivait > news:op.txvol4dyin6out(a)fasdfasdfasdfas: > >> no... I dont think it works. >> How can I confirm it? >> >> As far as I can see, the int5 code never executes, >> and the the messagebox does not run under ring0. >> maybe its to early to say.... how can I confirm that >> I am at ring0? > > I don't know. Here, it hangs, at run time, at CLI. > > (Win-2000, here). Why does this show only one messagebox Main: push 0 push Capt push Msg push 0 call 'user32.MessageBoxA' ; First save all nessesary startup values ; to restore them after Ring0 code finishes lea eax D$esp-8 xor ebx ebx xchg D$fs:ebx eax call @0 @0: cli sti xor ebx ebx xchg D$fs:ebx eax push 0 | call 'KERNEL32.ExitProcess' But this keeps repeating the messagebox over and over.... ??? Sorry for asking stupid questions.... But I dont understand this at all. Main: ; First save all nessesary startup values ; to restore them after Ring0 code finishes lea eax D$esp-8 xor ebx ebx xchg D$fs:ebx eax call @0 @0: push 0 push Capt push Msg push 0 call 'user32.MessageBoxA' cli sti xor ebx ebx xchg D$fs:ebx eax push 0 | call 'KERNEL32.ExitProcess' > > Betov. > > < http://rosasm.org > >
From: rhyde on 30 Aug 2007 11:50 On Aug 29, 11:56 pm, Betov <be...(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Now, is RadAsm better, as an interface than RosAsm's one (?). In most people's minds, absolutely yes. For one thing, RadAsm (and HIDE, which uses the same basic UI) employes MS' CUA interface. So people who use just about any reasonable Windows application can figure out how to use RadAsm (and HIDE). Unlike your lame UI which is off in left field. > This is a question which does not interrest me a lot, Of course not. That's why your user interface is so crummy. You don't bother spending the time or interest to figure out how to do it right. > but i > took a look at RadAsm Sources Editor (long ago), and it did > not compete: Of course not. You didn't write it. So it "doesn't compete". This is the argument you use against all competing products: "they're no competition." You are, of course, absolutely right. RadAsm (and similar products) are so much better than RosAsm in the UI department that they don't compete with you at all -- they just blow you away. > It was just a Text Editor. Typical Rene argument. Your product doesn't compete. So invent a brand- new category for your software and place everyone else in a different category so you can claim they don't compete. > I also took (same date) > a look at the Resources Editor, and it could not compete either. If you think that joke inside RosAsm is a "resource editor", well, you should spend some time with rc.exe. > > I wish the Anti-GPL gang-band to have improved their stuffs, > since then. So how do you feel about the GPL v3.0 again? It seems to me that *you're* the anti-GPL guy around here. hLater, Randy Hyde
From: Betov on 30 Aug 2007 11:59
"rhyde(a)cs.ucr.edu" <rhyde(a)cs.ucr.edu> �crivait news:1188488474.711277.274500(a)e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > Oh, and there's this little thing (over 1,000 functions and macros) > called the HLA standard library. Yes? Too bad that you are unable to write anything correct in Assembly: We could make it a Clip File, so that all the users would have to do would be to select, click and paste, insteads of keeping with obsolete HLL programming methods. :)) Betov. < http://rosasm.org > |