LS9/16 - not the desk for me
in [Live Sound]
|
From: Phildo on 26 Nov 2008 05:38 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:492CEED0.E0342557(a)hotmail.com... > > > Phildo wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > Phildo wrote: >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> > >> >> > We were talking about the EQ >> >> >> >> on a LIVE SOUND newsgroup. >> > >> > And why NOT ? Or doesn't live sound use EQ ? >> >> Of course it does. > > So why WHINE like a silly schoolgirl ? Got your period have you ? Yet again you just don't get it. You made a stupid statement, tried to use an obscure example from a studio to justify it, got pulled on it and now it seems it is YOU who is doing the whining because you realise you've made yourself look silly all over again. Phildo
From: Phildo on 26 Nov 2008 05:40 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:492CEE33.F41077F9(a)hotmail.com... > > > Phildo wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > Phildo wrote: >> > >> >> Serves him right. >> > >> > Precisely the kind of childish mean attitude I'd expect from you. >> >> If he can't do the time he shouldn't have done the crime. > > Arny's not perfect (nor am I) but I'd rather have a drink with him than > you. Glad to hear it. Pity you are about the only person here who thinks that way though. Pretty much everybody here now equates you with Arny as your posts (and general lunacy) are so similar they are hard to tell apart. Phildo
From: Phildo on 26 Nov 2008 05:41 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:492CEE86.C993C5DD(a)hotmail.com... > > > Phildo wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > Phildo wrote: >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> > >> >> > George is as usual just making it up anyway. The guy who improved >> >> > the >> >> > PL700 to produce the RSD 800B was Alan Pound. >> >> >> >> Still doesn't change the fact you promised to file lawsuits using your >> >> imaginary barrister friends >> > >> > Bollocks. >> >> Damed by your own words. See the post below. Your lies have been archived >> in >> google for posterity, > > I found a better solution. The same way I do in my work. But you promised which means you LIED. Sticking your head in the sand and pretending I'm not there is hardly a "better solution" though. Phildo
From: Phildo on 26 Nov 2008 05:42 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:492CEDDC.1E2EFAB5(a)hotmail.com... >. Remember my first hands on exposure to digital EQ > algorithms was 20 years ago at Prism Sound. Here we go yet again. Me, me, me, me, me etc etc. Is all you ever bloody talk about. Phildo
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2008 05:53
Phildo wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > > Phildo wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >> > Phildo wrote: > >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >> >> > > >> >> > We were talking about the EQ > >> >> > >> >> on a LIVE SOUND newsgroup. > >> > > >> > And why NOT ? Or doesn't live sound use EQ ? > >> > >> Of course it does. > > > > So why WHINE like a silly schoolgirl ? Got your period have you ? > > Yet again you just don't get it. You made a stupid statement, tried to use > an obscure example from a studio to justify it There is NOTHING obscure about a STUDIO. The same EQ algorithms can be used in both Studio and Live kit. Except you're too stupid (along with King George) to understand that. HOW MANY EQ ALGORITHMS HAVE *YOU* WRITTEN ? Graham Graham |