What mic likely?
in [Live Sound]
|
Prev: Allen & Heath GL4000 meter pod issue
Next: For Phildo
From: George's ProSound Company on 30 Sep 2008 09:47 "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote in message news:O-ydnY06PZfCt3_VnZ2dnUVZ8s_inZ2d(a)bt.com... > George's ProSound Company wrote: >> Here ya go you useless turd >> Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound >> about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it >> was under valid patent >> by his own admission he is a industrial thief. >> > > At which point does using someone elses good idea become theft. If that > feature isn't a copyrighted part of the design surely anyone can use it? it was under copyright, and current patent by eyesores own addmission
From: Ron(UK) on 30 Sep 2008 09:58 George's ProSound Company wrote: > "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote in message > news:O-ydnY06PZfCt3_VnZ2dnUVZ8s_inZ2d(a)bt.com... >> George's ProSound Company wrote: >>> Here ya go you useless turd >>> Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on alt.audio.pro.live-sound >>> about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for chassis construction while it >>> was under valid patent >>> by his own admission he is a industrial thief. >>> >> At which point does using someone elses good idea become theft. If that >> feature isn't a copyrighted part of the design surely anyone can use it? > > it was under copyright, and current patent by eyesores own addmission > > In that case, "He`s not the Messiah... He`s a very naughty boy!"
From: George's ProSound Company on 30 Sep 2008 10:01 "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote in message news:S6qdnZiNL_rlrX_VnZ2dnUVZ8vCdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > George's ProSound Company wrote: >> "Ron(UK)" <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote in message >> news:O-ydnY06PZfCt3_VnZ2dnUVZ8s_inZ2d(a)bt.com... >>> George's ProSound Company wrote: >>>> Here ya go you useless turd >>>> Eyeore, Graham someoneoranother has BRAGGED on >>>> alt.audio.pro.live-sound about STEALING qsc's mechanical design for >>>> chassis construction while it was under valid patent >>>> by his own admission he is a industrial thief. >>>> >>> At which point does using someone elses good idea become theft. If that >>> feature isn't a copyrighted part of the design surely anyone can use it? >> >> it was under copyright, and current patent by eyesores own addmission > > In that case, "He`s not the Messiah... He`s a very naughty boy!" I just want him to grow the balls to send the lawyers he promised me years ago George
From: hank alrich on 30 Sep 2008 10:14 Phildo <Phil(a)phildo.net> wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:48E14EC4.977FE27F(a)hotmail.com... > > > > > > Phildo wrote: > > > >> "Eeyore" wrote > >> > Phildo wrote: > >> > > >> >> Still waiting to hear from those lawyers you promised to set on me by > >> >> the > >> >> way. > >> > > >> > As ever you're lying. I said I WOULD speak to a solicitor (as they're > >> > called in this country btw) if you did not desist libelling me. You > >> desisted, > >> > >> No, I didn't. My behaviour did not change one bit, > > > > Yes it did. > > No, it didn't. That goes for George and myself. > > > End of conversation. > > Awwwww, poor little Eyesore is being made to look awful silly so thinks he > can get out of it like that? Jeez, you really are pathetic. > > Still haven't heard from the lawyers you promised to set on me by the way. Ninny, ninny, ninny. I wonder which of you will make a serious attempt to grow out of your marriage gone bad. -- ha shut up and play your guitar
From: hank alrich on 30 Sep 2008 10:14
George's ProSound Company <bmoas(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I just want him to grow the balls to send the lawyers he promised me years > ago Right, you just want a bunch of lawyers harrassing you. God one, George. The noise-to-signal ratio is growing here very well. -- ha shut up and play your guitar |